Extra Particulars Concerning Diddy’s Reported Response To The Sexual Assault Lawsuit
In accordance with AP Information, Combs’ authorized workforce filed the movement on Friday, April 26. The music mogul’s authorized workforce is reportedly asserting that Diddy can’t be sued for specific claims within the lawsuit as a result of “sure legal guidelines didn’t exist” when the incidents allegedly occurred in 1991.
Diddy’s authorized workforce is reportedly asking for Joi Dickerson-Neal’s claims about “revenge porn and human trafficking” to be “dismissed with prejudice.”
CNN notes that Combs’ attorneys are persevering with to label Dickerson-Neal’s allegations “false, offensive, and salacious.” Moreover, Diddy’s attorneys are reportedly asking that “allegations towards Combs’ firm” be dismissed as properly. To notice, TMZ studies that the request refers to Diddy’s corporations, “Dangerous Boy Information or Dangerous Boy Leisure.”
Nevertheless, TMZ notes that Diddy’s workforce has not filed to dismiss the primary “two counts” within the lawsuit. These claims allege Combs inflicted “assault,” battery, and “intentional infliction of emotional misery” on the plaintiff.
Extra Particulars Concerning The Lawsuit & Allegations
As The Shade Room beforehand reported, Dickerson-Neal filed the swimsuit towards Combs in November 2023. Moreover, the swimsuit was reportedly filed below New York’s Grownup Survivors Act.
On the time, it was reported that Dickerson-Neal accused Diddy of sexually assaulting her after a date in 1991. Diddy allegedly gave the lady a drug. Then, allegedly sexually assaulted her at a music studio.
In accordance with AP Information, the lady accused Combs of recording the assault. Moreover, she alleged he shared the footage with buddies.
In an preliminary response to the lawsuit, a spokesperson for the mogul reportedly denied the allegations. Moreover, they labeled the claims a “cash seize.”
“This last-minute lawsuit is an instance of how a well-intentioned regulation may be turned on its head. Ms. Dickerson’s 32-year-old story is made up and never credible. Mr. Combs by no means assaulted her, and she or he implicates corporations that didn’t exist. That is purely a cash seize and nothing extra,” their assertion learn, per New York Publish.
