[ad_1]
Content material warning: This text comprises references to intimate accomplice abuse. Don’t learn on if this subject is triggering.
Rachel Leviss shocked the Brvosphere by dropping a lawsuit in opposition to her former Vanderpump Guidelines co-stars and manufacturing firms. In exploring the lawsuit’s trivia, followers discovered some reasonably putting claims in opposition to James Kennedy.
Rachel accuses LVP of defending “violent” James
On February 29, u/the_smart_girl posted some attention-grabbing excerpts from Rachel’s lawsuit to the Actual Housewives subreddit. The excerpts described James as “liable to violent outbursts and grappling with long-standing substance abuse points and emotional dysregulation.” The go well with additionally alleged that James “would repeatedly berate Leviss, falsely accuse her of dishonest, and act in a typically unhinged method.”
The go well with claims that proof of this abuse was solely partly captured on Bravo’s cameras. Rachel reportedly threatened to go away James if he didn’t get his alcohol use below management, however “his despicable habits was not solely a perform of alcohol abuse.” The go well with additionally claims that James “erupted at Leviss’ mom and father and kicked her household canine 4 instances in an uncontrollable rage.”
Past James, the go well with alleges that his “harmful habits was well-known by Bravo, Evolution, and the solid.” There was additionally a declare of James assaulting Kristen Doute on digicam with the footage by no means airing. Moreover, Lisa Vanderpump was credited as James’ “highly effective ally … who served as his protector.”
Reactions to Rachel’s claims are various
Reactions to the submit various. One commenter took the accusations as affirmation of their suspicions. “I knew he was violent and harmful and I don’t even know him,” they wrote. “In fact the community and manufacturing firm knew! They’d all seen or skilled it firsthand, and any declare in any other case is ridiculous.”
One other reply, nevertheless, was rather more skeptical. “Why is everybody taking what she’s saying on this lawsuit as gospel when there are apparent lies and exaggerations all through?” they requested.
“If James did in truth kick a canine, that’s despicable, however she has additionally inferred he bodily abused her and but that’s not in right here? Her tales have been ever altering, she shouldn’t be a dependable witness within the slightest.”
As of now, Rachel’s allegations are nothing greater than allegations – they can’t be substantiated – leaving followers to solely speculate.
[ad_2]
